

And I am fed up with the stupidity of spending my free time replying to you on “ghacks”. While I work from home, I am a “regular worker” and have limited free time. Perhaps you are ignorant of “remote work”? In short, I work from home. Why do you get “bent out of shape” in your replies? Assumption? Or is it arbitrary? I have posted for you many times, clearly and simply, that I am a “Microsoft Team’s user” and have never used or want to use Skype. Oh, your childish selfishness is disgusting. You couldn’t stand the unpopularity of “Skype” in this thread, so you made Firefox the scapegoat.Īll you had to do was make an honest comment about “Skype” and it would have been fine, but it looks like your intrusion (expectation) has turned the topic into “Firefox”. So you’re a long-time user of Skype, and it’s your favorite app. I see, I could read your true intentions. I cannot spend any more time talking with you. I point out that “off-topic” is the act of “intruding into other people’s conversations with off-the-wall and derailing topics based on specific keywords that are different from the original intention”.Īs long as you post independently and don’t interrupt conversations with others, gHacks will “allow it to be on-topic as long as it is relevant to the article”. In any case, I don’t care if the browser supports it, as I prefer standalone desktop apps to using it in a browser. I just checked the link with edge, and I’ve got the same result : “Browser not supported” :)Īfter all, such a label is a lazy substitute. I’ve removed Edge and can’t (and won’t) confirm that it works, but according to Matthieu Your definition of “off-topic” is skewed at Heart,Įven Firefox (78.14.0esr, Nightly 94.0a1) works to Skype perfectly fine if I spoof the user agent. When I do this, it is not off-topic, since it features prominently in the article. But I can also discuss any other point made in the article which includes the exclusion of Firefox based on its irrelevant rendering engine. See, I answered the obligatory questions the kind of which Martin comes up with under every single articles to spark a discussion. Stupid redesign, designers have to justify their ongoing employment somehow. > What is your take on the future version?

You expect anyone to believe (2)? Really? That has to be the actual joke here. You are free to express your opinion on the topic, but it would be “in your shame” to show your face at the beginning of a reply what is the more likely reason for Firefox not being supported:ġ) Microsoft doesn’t want to sacrifice money and time supporting an engine hardly anyone uses, so made the decision to drop it.Ģ) Microsoft is dead set on making an irrelevant browser that is in no way a threat to them even more irrelevant, just because. In other words, even if you get new users, the old ones are leaving, which is the common view of me and other users who were users from Opera). Vivaldi is the one that is “in an extremely precarious position”, moreover is not even looked at by anyone (It’s not that they are not known, but that they are too niche and users are leaving because they are disgusted. User acquisition is stagnant at around 2.2 million, and the CEO is aware of the business crisis. Initial release Ap5 years ago (Technical Preview released on Jan 27, 2015) Vivaldi Active Users (and counting): 2,300,000+īrowser startup Vivaldi says needs 5 million users to turn profit In demographics, the world population is the total number of humans currently living, and was estimated to have reached 7,800,000,000 people as of March. Now You: haver you used Skype in the past? What is your take on the future version? Will it support always barging in on the subject of Firefox and shouting “anti-Mozilla” at the top of your lungs, but what about your favorite browser, Vivaldi? In-call reactions redesign and support for "super reactions".TwinCam feature to add other devices as secondary cameras to Skype.
#WHAT IS SILVERLIGHT PREFERENCES FOR MAC ANDROID#
Office Lens functionality on Android and iOS.


Options to disable video stream and to hide audio-only participants in the calling stage.Performance improvements: 30% on the desktop, 2000% on Android.All participants will be visible, even if they don't share video.Skype users find themselves on the main view during calls.Familiar interface with a modernized look.Here are the most important changes coming to the next version of Skype: Microsoft's announcement on the official Skype blog is a long read.
